<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Saleae 2013 Web Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.saleae.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.saleae.com</link>
	<description>The semi-official blog of Joe Garrison &#38; Saleae</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy April 1st, 2013! by Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-7138</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1397#comment-7138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s first now after reading this blog entry I realize &quot;1.1.17 beta&quot; is an actual release and not just some kind of April fools&#039; joke.
The news about 1.1.17 beta was posted at your website on April 1st, 2013, so I always assumed it was some kind of April fools&#039; prank and never bothered to read on: http://community.saleae.com
Quote: &quot;We have a new beta version as of April 1st, 2013; 1.1.17 beta&quot;.

April 1st is a bad day to announce any actual news, especially when new announcements aren&#039;t made on a daily- or even weekly basis. After seeing the date at the top of the news I automatically took it for some April fools&#039; joke. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s first now after reading this blog entry I realize &#8220;1.1.17 beta&#8221; is an actual release and not just some kind of April fools&#8217; joke.<br />
The news about 1.1.17 beta was posted at your website on April 1st, 2013, so I always assumed it was some kind of April fools&#8217; prank and never bothered to read on: <a href="http://community.saleae.com" rel="nofollow">http://community.saleae.com</a><br />
Quote: &#8220;We have a new beta version as of April 1st, 2013; 1.1.17 beta&#8221;.</p>
<p>April 1st is a bad day to announce any actual news, especially when new announcements aren&#8217;t made on a daily- or even weekly basis. After seeing the date at the top of the news I automatically took it for some April fools&#8217; joke. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy April 1st, 2013! by Joe Garrison</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-6176</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1397#comment-6176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Jon, that was quite a while ago!  After Logic took off we decided it would be best to focus on that.

If you go back far enough in this blog, there&#039;s a bit about the iMote.  Good times!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jon, that was quite a while ago!  After Logic took off we decided it would be best to focus on that.</p>
<p>If you go back far enough in this blog, there&#8217;s a bit about the iMote.  Good times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy April 1st, 2013! by Joe Garrison</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-6175</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1397#comment-6175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2012/

That was last year&#039;s -- the website&#039;s code automatically re-enabled it - not what we intended :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2012/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2012/</a></p>
<p>That was last year&#8217;s &#8212; the website&#8217;s code automatically re-enabled it &#8211; not what we intended :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy April 1st, 2013! by Don</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-6173</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1397#comment-6173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What became of yesterday&#039;s Super-Duper? I thought that was particularly brilliant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What became of yesterday&#8217;s Super-Duper? I thought that was particularly brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy April 1st, 2013! by Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/happy-april-1st-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-6158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 06:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1397#comment-6158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What ever happened to the IMOTE?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened to the IMOTE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Current Sense Amplifier for Differential ADC (low-side, remote sensor) by Joe Garrison</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/current-sense-amplifier-for-differential-adc-low-side-remote-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5946</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1376#comment-5946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually a better rule of thumb might more have to do with the slew rate, as that would directly limit how fast you can follow the input.  You can play around with the phase/group delay effect of GBP and Slew Rate in LTspice just by using a UniversalOmp2 in follower configuration.

[Edit:  Wrong, it looks like LTSpice ignores slew rate in AC Analysis, which I suppose makes some sense.]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually a better rule of thumb might more have to do with the slew rate, as that would directly limit how fast you can follow the input.  You can play around with the phase/group delay effect of GBP and Slew Rate in LTspice just by using a UniversalOmp2 in follower configuration.</p>
<p>[Edit:  Wrong, it looks like LTSpice ignores slew rate in AC Analysis, which I suppose makes some sense.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Current Sense Amplifier for Differential ADC (low-side, remote sensor) by Joe Garrison</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/current-sense-amplifier-for-differential-adc-low-side-remote-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5945</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 03:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1376#comment-5945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jason, something related to this came up today so I thought I would get back to you on your question, which I don&#039;t think I quite got before --

It appears that staying well bellow the GBP of the op-amp will greatly reduce the chance that phase differences would appear between the two op-amps.  I believe this has to do with phase margin, and in general, how fast the op-amp can follow the input, and how that speed can change with load current and other operating conditions.  Keeping currents low would help, but then there&#039;s also potentially differences between the parts.  

In fact, my thinking is that the phase will start dropping off about a decade before the gain (x1) will.  That would imply that you need to be operating at least a decade below the GBP to avoid phase variation due to parts/operating condition.

Anyone else want to chime in on this one?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason, something related to this came up today so I thought I would get back to you on your question, which I don&#8217;t think I quite got before &#8211;</p>
<p>It appears that staying well bellow the GBP of the op-amp will greatly reduce the chance that phase differences would appear between the two op-amps.  I believe this has to do with phase margin, and in general, how fast the op-amp can follow the input, and how that speed can change with load current and other operating conditions.  Keeping currents low would help, but then there&#8217;s also potentially differences between the parts.  </p>
<p>In fact, my thinking is that the phase will start dropping off about a decade before the gain (x1) will.  That would imply that you need to be operating at least a decade below the GBP to avoid phase variation due to parts/operating condition.</p>
<p>Anyone else want to chime in on this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Current Sense Amplifier for Differential ADC (low-side, remote sensor) by Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/current-sense-amplifier-for-differential-adc-low-side-remote-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1376#comment-5259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, that&#039;s exactly what I meant.

Keep up the awesome work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, that&#8217;s exactly what I meant.</p>
<p>Keep up the awesome work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Current Sense Amplifier for Differential ADC (low-side, remote sensor) by Joe Garrison</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/current-sense-amplifier-for-differential-adc-low-side-remote-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5141</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1376#comment-5141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Jason, great to hear!

I think that since both signals are undergoing the exact same transfer function (within the component tolerances) so their phase delays should also be identical.  Is that what you mean?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jason, great to hear!</p>
<p>I think that since both signals are undergoing the exact same transfer function (within the component tolerances) so their phase delays should also be identical.  Is that what you mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Current Sense Amplifier for Differential ADC (low-side, remote sensor) by Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.saleae.com/current-sense-amplifier-for-differential-adc-low-side-remote-sensor/comment-page-1/#comment-5140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.saleae.com/?p=1376#comment-5140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love your articles. I&#039;m a little rusty on my analog, but is there a phase difference between the op-amps that you would have to take into account as that would translate into a pretty big error on your output? Or is it a don&#039;t care since both op-amps are the same and this is low bandwidth? Thanks Joe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your articles. I&#8217;m a little rusty on my analog, but is there a phase difference between the op-amps that you would have to take into account as that would translate into a pretty big error on your output? Or is it a don&#8217;t care since both op-amps are the same and this is low bandwidth? Thanks Joe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
